Where are we truly going as a species?
Why are we in fact still using old fashioned fuels in our vehicles when more advanced technology is already here?
If the economic excuse is that if oil companies go under, the world cannot sustain it´s global economy. Then perhaps economy or our lack of understanding of it needs to be analyzed. Millions have been poured into the sort of technology it takes to extract oil. And certainly there will be mega losses for petrol conglomerates if oil becomes redundant as a fuel. And this certainly will have an impact on the world economy, if the oil companies direction for investment is not toward electric and sustainable tech.
Or must the world and human kind suffer so that an outdated fuel source can be continued because the companies have invested so many billions into drilling and refining?
Human kind must advance, we cannot be driving vehicles that can potentially explode in an accident! We must give ourselves the best technology and base a new improved economic strategy on promoting this new technology. Otherwise we are not being fair to predecessors who worked so hard and evolved our technology so much to bring us to where we are. Otherwise we will do further damage to our environment so that the world economy isn't affected.
But the world economy has been affected. In fact the risks taken in all sorts of ventures commendable and otherwise by large corporations. If it is the oil companies boycotting and putting embargoes on new technology so the flow of oil can be guaranteed they are not going to do more damage to the world economy than the bankers and wall street tweekers already have.
Electric cars and all forms of electric transport must become our norm. There is no room whatsoever for the outdated petrol fume transport.
If oil is indeed a finite then we better leave it alone for now as it could prove even more valuable in the future as our civilization becomes more curious, ambitious and dynamic.
If oil companies are allowed to continue the same way they have for the last decade I would say that our strength and intelligence as a species will be compromised.
It is self destructive and suicidal for us to use up such a valuable resource as a fuel that can now be replaced by electricity.
it is counterproductive and is preventing us all as a species from moving forward to greater things.
We need to ban the use of this old technology.
Oil companies must rethink their approach and start giving back to the world by investing what they have in alternative energy creators. They have such power, if they only had the vision.
I fear their business world is much like politics old minds old ideas and an extremely adamant conservative approach to alternative energy.
Problem is time is ticking, are they being held accountable for the indirect damage that their dinosaur attitude is having on the quality of big city air? Or for car accidents that end in explosions.
All this without even touching on the subject of the middle east.
The world must change, we cannot live in fear that each time there is a new innovation we may not employ it because it will compromise our old traditional companies that promote outdated and harmful fuels! Are we that weak, afraid and feeble that we cannot move on?
Lp's, cassettes, videos and Dvd's slowly these things have become redundant!
We moved on, yet oil companies hold the world to ransom still!
But look at who we are, we are passed all that! We have dozens of other sources of energy many need to be developed further. If we have cunning and ruthless old companies stalling and buying new technology to hide it or to own it with out actually employing it, what are we to do?
For now we can only let them win, let them pollute and sell us the fossil fuel, because they have made other technology seem left wing or less masculine for men. Molding the masses with quite a bit of dexterity. Just spend the money on new technology, Homo sapiens need to expand and innovate, we cannot sabotage this technological revolution right now! It's for our own good that we advance and if you knowingly hold the world back, well that in itself is the worst punishment I can think of. Being responsible for holding mankind back from greatness!!!
There is no worse shame!
There is nothing as horrid or more repugnant!
It's time to put the horses back into the stables, it's time to let go of old ways of thinking. it's time to innovate. Finally move forward.
Monday, February 8, 2016
Tuesday, January 19, 2016
Human Kind's true plight
Human beings in the world today are so diverse. There is still such an incredible variety in the types of people we can become. Our goals and beliefs.
We seem so different, it seems there is nothing that brings us together, or gives us common ground as one group except our basic needs and our anatomy.
How can we move forward as one, as human kind?
Do we not have millions of goals?
Do most of us not follow a similar dream?
What would it cost us to have a planet where parts of the developing world who were open to it could be transformed and become an extension of the quality of life the developed world has.
I'm not talking about a handout or a grant.
Human kind is slowly getting ready to expand into our solar system. This is an amazing triumph.
The goals of a species like ours should not be national. It's too cheap from a world economic point of view. Short term and long term prosperity can be reached by developing countries who are too poor and disorganized to care for their own citizens.
Countries that are developed could become even richer if they had invested interests in the success of projects in poorer countries.
Developed countries like...
France
England
Canada
Taking on huge projects that covered each of the pillars of our civilization- Economics, Infrastructure, Social innovation and Environmental transformation
in countries like ...
Cambodia
Sudan
Bolivia
The most common argument is the UN has tried a lot. But because of political interest and bureaucratic red tape, only small temporary projects are realized. None of which really make any groundbreaking changes in the pillars of civilization. Poor countries governments refuse to become part of the change. But soon they will be exposed more than ever before, if their goals are not to create better living conditions for their people it will be published. The world itself must lend a hand one that doesn't mind getting bitten once or twice but share in the bountiful rewards of countries that choose change.
WE ARE EARTHLINGs, OUR WORLD SHOULD BE JUDGED BY IT'S POOREST COUNTRIES AND STATES.
We have no real choice, we make excuses and pretend we do. But the advancement of the third world is vital as we make steps toward the stars. Again this is no handout. When one country becomes wealthier that wealth will be partly shared with other country's companies and conglomerates that got them there. Third world countries paired with developed countries must work together and be directly involved to ensure the economic soundness and success of projects that developed countries undertake and realize in the third world. They will have stakes in each project relative to their funds and physical support. Successful projects will yield real profit for the companies involved and reduce debt for the developed countries efforts.
Pairing the developed country with the developing country will mean both governments sign a contract whose laws would supersede the laws of their own countries. This would make the governments of both countries vulnerable to the overseers of the organization. Corruption and incompetence inside governments in the third world countries that signed the pacts would be confronted first. Exceptions would be made for government figures who despite their guilt were willing to be checked and audited as new and fantastic projects started becoming reality in their countries. Unlike earnest attempts made by charities and the UN that lead to little progress. Incentives would be high, and penalties would be realized after transparency acts were signed.
Poor countries that signed pacts with their developed country would have their debts drastically reduced, as consolation to the world bank small percentages of value in the finished projects that showed obvious and lasting positive impact would be owned by the world bank.
The governments of poor countries would no longer be able to siphon money out of projects in their country, but would be encouraged to participate in the projects that guaranteed sounder infrastructure, a better economy, improved quality of life, health and education not at the expense of the environment, sustainable agricultural endeavors.
As each project was realized accumulating into amazing results of social change and economic stability, providing country could prove it's capitulation, it's national debt would be wiped. It would have better and more diplomatic and trading rights. Poor countries who refused to capitulate or failed to comply with the international pairing agreement would not be given these benefits, and although in crisis it would be the international organizations to give aid to the country in need, if that country's government had refused to become part, they would be given the bare minimum, the basics.
Poor countries whose governments invited and upheld the pacts would be given certain powers to realize their own powerful projects as long as they could prove the project was to the direct well being of it's citizens.
Poor countries who signed the pact would be forbidden to got to war but would be allowed a military. Although no outside funds or support would be given to advance the poor countries military.
The country no matter how poor or disorganized would be completely protected under an act obliging all other members developing countries and poor countries to defend it.
Bigger countries would become part of the organization by drawing up agreements on cooperation to even bigger and loftier goals. The U.S.A and Russia would pair to develop and innovate in operations in space. Russia and the U.S.A would work together on ship designs and fuel innovations. they would agree directly on the logistics of establishing dome oxygen and plantation farms on mars and mining projects.
Part of eastern Russia would sold across from Alaska as good faith. Part of Alaska to the Russians. Neither part may access oil, both parts are for agricultural or forestry endeavors. Farming communities with the tools of new agricultural tech would be obliged to work together, landowners from the American side employing Russians and vice versa, revolutionizing farming and agriculture in Alaska and Asia's far north. Huge tax cuts would be given to these farmers. Seed companies and farming machinery companies would give massive discounts to start the project.
Their debts would be reduced for capitulation and a bridge would be built from Alaska to eastern Russia. There would be embassies at aerospace installations in both countries. Total cooperation in combating world terrorism in the middle east and northern eastern middle east. Partners in weapon innovations and military training. The unspoken protectors of the world against terrorism working together, never agreeing 100 % but never refusing to back the other when world stability is at risk.
A one world policy will be installed.
For the advancement of human kind. All countries whether they sign a pact to become part of the ONE world or not will be watched. As mankind makes its next step toward the stars, it must be equally determined to face religious groups who threaten a free world. And violent religious groups must be targeted by every company and country in the world so that human kind can continue, so that we all may exist.
So that we may flourish.
Without fear of reprisals from Islamic terrorism, or the Christian right or any self destructive and hateful force.
So that we may expand freely without self destructive forces ready to cut us down at our foundations because we chose to grow, profit and realize huge visions which will inspire our children for generations to come!
Which are synonymous with how glorious we are as MANKIND.
Yes I think we deserve to live!
So our children can choose and expand on their most wondrous ideas without any kind of prejudice or religious extremism to cut them down.
If love and freedom are not practiced first by the believer and preachers of a religion, then their religion can not exist in the future.
There is those of us who believe compassion and human achievement toward a fairer and more prosperous world is synonymous to faith. That must supersede people's superstition or crazy interpretations of scripture. it must supersede people's warped sense of god's will.
We must leave those self destroyers behind, most of them will self destruct without our hands involved. Innovation and technology to see Human Kind expand, to see the world economy stabilize and a new era of prosperity of all countries willing to unite to build the future together from now until forever after.
We seem so different, it seems there is nothing that brings us together, or gives us common ground as one group except our basic needs and our anatomy.
How can we move forward as one, as human kind?
Do we not have millions of goals?
Do most of us not follow a similar dream?
What would it cost us to have a planet where parts of the developing world who were open to it could be transformed and become an extension of the quality of life the developed world has.
I'm not talking about a handout or a grant.
Human kind is slowly getting ready to expand into our solar system. This is an amazing triumph.
The goals of a species like ours should not be national. It's too cheap from a world economic point of view. Short term and long term prosperity can be reached by developing countries who are too poor and disorganized to care for their own citizens.
Countries that are developed could become even richer if they had invested interests in the success of projects in poorer countries.
Developed countries like...
France
England
Canada
Taking on huge projects that covered each of the pillars of our civilization- Economics, Infrastructure, Social innovation and Environmental transformation
in countries like ...
Cambodia
Sudan
Bolivia
The most common argument is the UN has tried a lot. But because of political interest and bureaucratic red tape, only small temporary projects are realized. None of which really make any groundbreaking changes in the pillars of civilization. Poor countries governments refuse to become part of the change. But soon they will be exposed more than ever before, if their goals are not to create better living conditions for their people it will be published. The world itself must lend a hand one that doesn't mind getting bitten once or twice but share in the bountiful rewards of countries that choose change.
WE ARE EARTHLINGs, OUR WORLD SHOULD BE JUDGED BY IT'S POOREST COUNTRIES AND STATES.
We have no real choice, we make excuses and pretend we do. But the advancement of the third world is vital as we make steps toward the stars. Again this is no handout. When one country becomes wealthier that wealth will be partly shared with other country's companies and conglomerates that got them there. Third world countries paired with developed countries must work together and be directly involved to ensure the economic soundness and success of projects that developed countries undertake and realize in the third world. They will have stakes in each project relative to their funds and physical support. Successful projects will yield real profit for the companies involved and reduce debt for the developed countries efforts.
Pairing the developed country with the developing country will mean both governments sign a contract whose laws would supersede the laws of their own countries. This would make the governments of both countries vulnerable to the overseers of the organization. Corruption and incompetence inside governments in the third world countries that signed the pacts would be confronted first. Exceptions would be made for government figures who despite their guilt were willing to be checked and audited as new and fantastic projects started becoming reality in their countries. Unlike earnest attempts made by charities and the UN that lead to little progress. Incentives would be high, and penalties would be realized after transparency acts were signed.
Poor countries that signed pacts with their developed country would have their debts drastically reduced, as consolation to the world bank small percentages of value in the finished projects that showed obvious and lasting positive impact would be owned by the world bank.
The governments of poor countries would no longer be able to siphon money out of projects in their country, but would be encouraged to participate in the projects that guaranteed sounder infrastructure, a better economy, improved quality of life, health and education not at the expense of the environment, sustainable agricultural endeavors.
As each project was realized accumulating into amazing results of social change and economic stability, providing country could prove it's capitulation, it's national debt would be wiped. It would have better and more diplomatic and trading rights. Poor countries who refused to capitulate or failed to comply with the international pairing agreement would not be given these benefits, and although in crisis it would be the international organizations to give aid to the country in need, if that country's government had refused to become part, they would be given the bare minimum, the basics.
Poor countries whose governments invited and upheld the pacts would be given certain powers to realize their own powerful projects as long as they could prove the project was to the direct well being of it's citizens.
Poor countries who signed the pact would be forbidden to got to war but would be allowed a military. Although no outside funds or support would be given to advance the poor countries military.
The country no matter how poor or disorganized would be completely protected under an act obliging all other members developing countries and poor countries to defend it.
Bigger countries would become part of the organization by drawing up agreements on cooperation to even bigger and loftier goals. The U.S.A and Russia would pair to develop and innovate in operations in space. Russia and the U.S.A would work together on ship designs and fuel innovations. they would agree directly on the logistics of establishing dome oxygen and plantation farms on mars and mining projects.
Part of eastern Russia would sold across from Alaska as good faith. Part of Alaska to the Russians. Neither part may access oil, both parts are for agricultural or forestry endeavors. Farming communities with the tools of new agricultural tech would be obliged to work together, landowners from the American side employing Russians and vice versa, revolutionizing farming and agriculture in Alaska and Asia's far north. Huge tax cuts would be given to these farmers. Seed companies and farming machinery companies would give massive discounts to start the project.
Their debts would be reduced for capitulation and a bridge would be built from Alaska to eastern Russia. There would be embassies at aerospace installations in both countries. Total cooperation in combating world terrorism in the middle east and northern eastern middle east. Partners in weapon innovations and military training. The unspoken protectors of the world against terrorism working together, never agreeing 100 % but never refusing to back the other when world stability is at risk.
A one world policy will be installed.
For the advancement of human kind. All countries whether they sign a pact to become part of the ONE world or not will be watched. As mankind makes its next step toward the stars, it must be equally determined to face religious groups who threaten a free world. And violent religious groups must be targeted by every company and country in the world so that human kind can continue, so that we all may exist.
So that we may flourish.
Without fear of reprisals from Islamic terrorism, or the Christian right or any self destructive and hateful force.
So that we may expand freely without self destructive forces ready to cut us down at our foundations because we chose to grow, profit and realize huge visions which will inspire our children for generations to come!
Which are synonymous with how glorious we are as MANKIND.
Yes I think we deserve to live!
So our children can choose and expand on their most wondrous ideas without any kind of prejudice or religious extremism to cut them down.
If love and freedom are not practiced first by the believer and preachers of a religion, then their religion can not exist in the future.
There is those of us who believe compassion and human achievement toward a fairer and more prosperous world is synonymous to faith. That must supersede people's superstition or crazy interpretations of scripture. it must supersede people's warped sense of god's will.
We must leave those self destroyers behind, most of them will self destruct without our hands involved. Innovation and technology to see Human Kind expand, to see the world economy stabilize and a new era of prosperity of all countries willing to unite to build the future together from now until forever after.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)